In Penrose’s “Reading and Writing Without Authority” and Grauman’s “What’s That Supposed to Mean?” both authors stress that authority in writing is a social construct that is shaped by context, audience, and the connections that exist between writers and readers rather than a set attribute.
According to Penrose’s study, she believes that conventional ideas of competence and legitimacy are frequently the source of authority, which might put up obstacles in the way of people who might not feel as empowered to speak up. This is a reflection of a wider social problem in which some voices control the discourse while others are ignored or excluded.
In Grauman’s “What’s That Supposed to Mean?” he shows how interpretations of authority can differ significantly depending on personal experiences. He shows that some accounts of diverse people are what one person can consider an authoritative remark but may not be considered authoritative to another person. This puts doubt on the idea that having knowledge is the only requirement for authority. It also emphasizes the significance of perspective and context in understanding how authority appears in writing.
Penrose’s “Reading and Writing Without Authority” and Grauman’s “What’s That Supposed to Mean?” offer insightful examinations of the ways in which social settings and individual experiences shape, test, and ultimately negotiate literary authority. Both authors urge students to examine their own authority, value the perspectives of others, and welcome criticism as a tool for development and comprehension. This study helps us understand the collaborative aspect of good communication and the flexibility of authority in writing.
Leave a Reply