This article shows that it is important for authors to have their own authority in writing. It was interesting to see the similarities and differences between two authors writing an essay about the same topic. Given, of course, Janet was a college freshman and Roger was working towards his doctorate in philosophy, their responses were not going to be all the same. However, both seemed to focus on different aspects and arguments about paternalism. Their differing amounts of cases used to get their ideas across either shows the levels of confidence and expertise between the two or their expectations for this study. Janet seemed like she knew how to analyze the cases and morality of paternalism, but was not confident to write in her own voice or state her own opinions. She also seemed intrigued about the very concept of paternalism, questioning the functions and using scenarios to answer those questions. Ultimately, as her work was reflected, she did not seem to insert herself into the conversation, yet showed professional writing abilities and genuine knowledge. Janet’s case truly proves that when authors are taught in high school to write, they learn only not to use personal opinions or beliefs and only tell the truth about the text. Perhaps Janet is not at fault for her lack of her own authority, however, it is important to understand that authors should view certain topics and cases with a sense that they should feel included rather than writing about it and making arguments with no signs of personal influence.
Leave a Reply