By Ashley Casimir
Janet and Roger both share the definition of Paternalism in their own way. Reading the article not only made me observe the differences between those two paper but it made me realized what I will do next time in my own paper. I relate more in Janet side and not realizing that My judgement, thoughts, ideas and etc should be written in my paper. without those tools. the author wont know who’s the reader really is.
Janet Writing
Janet was freshman in college that knew nothing about the study of ethics. therefore her paper could go both ways, really good or not so good. instead of Janet putting her observations, ideas, experience and etc to her paper. her paper was straight-forward factual and informations about paternalism. you can tell it was going to be a informative essay when she first stared her essay with “This Paper”. but theirs still room for improvement so its never too late for her. especially because she an freshman in college.
Roger Writing
Roger completing his Doctoral work in philosophy. He had knowledge of ethics, the conversation, the domain and its indues and customs. he knows it all therefore his paper was going to be great. it was noticeable that he was in the nursing field based on his paper. reading his paper was like listening to his voice speech. it was understandable and profession. it was visional. easy to imagine. it was a nice paper to read.
My Conclusion
We should take out time in our paper and it doesn’t hurt to add your thoughts, ideas, observation to your paper. sometimes a paper doesn’t have to be a factual essay because it sound repeated and informative. Janet a freshman and we all don’t know her high school experience like therefore, with the proper education she will received in college. it can advance her writing. Roger already completed his work and higher up than Janet. therefore, he was taught the great tools to write a paper. to Sum it up, the reader would like to relate and read your judgement in a paper to understand you more.
Leave a Reply